Dial down the FREE Subscription for such premium content on our YouTube channel.
Once upon a time, there was a schoolboy who was struggling with traditional schooling. He had difficulties with the rigid and rote learning methods of the education system in his early years. His teachers often considered him a problem student because he questioned authority and didn’t conform to the standard curriculum. He was even expelled from school at one point.
However, his insatiable curiosity and passion for understanding the universe never waned. He continued to educate himself by asking questions through critical reading, exploration, and experimentation. Ultimately, his self-driven education led him to formulate some of the most revolutionary theories in physics like the theory of relativity. He was none other than Einstein.
What does the above story show? It shows the essential role of skepticism, curiosity, and critical inquiry in the pursuit of scientific knowledge. Unlike dogmatic belief systems that rely on unquestionable truths, science thrives on questioning, testing, and refining ideas. It is a powerful tool that propels scientific progress by challenging assumptions and uncovering deeper truths.
Footprints of doubters across the spectrum
In ancient Greece, Plato criticized conventional wisdom and sought deeper truths beyond appearances. His philosophy is driven by the belief that most people accept inadequate or false understandings of reality. Plato refined the Socratic method, a dialectical approach to inquiry involving asking and answering questions to stimulate critical thought and illuminate ideas. His famous allegory of the cave demonstrates the journey from ignorance to enlightenment. These things made Plato as a true man of political science.
Subsequently, in medieval Europe, doubt compels scientists to critically examine established theories and data. Without skepticism and empirical studies, science would stagnate, as unquestioned beliefs would persist regardless of their accuracy. For instance, the geocentric model of the universe, which positioned Earth at the center, remained dominant until astronomers like Copernicus and Galileo questioned its validity. It was Copernicus and Galileo who brought heliocentric theories against a geocentric model of the universe that made them a true man of science.
Similarly, in the modern world, the growth of the industrial revolution has created haves and have-nots in the society. This inequality was challenged by the remarkable communist thinker, Karl Marx. He questioned capitalism in the light of deteriorating situation of workers in the industries. Marx argued that capitalism alienates workers from several aspects of their lives, reducing their humanity to a commodity. His ability to question the dominant ideology made him a true leader of political science through critical assessment.
Relevance of Doubter in the contemporary world
In the modern world, Karl Popper gave a popular theory – The theory of falsification. According to this theory, for a theory to be scientific, it must be open to being proven wrong. This openness to disproof shows the spirit of doubt, as it requires scientists to challenge their own ideas and accept evidence that contradicts them. Doubt is also crucial in hypothesis testing. Scientists formulate hypotheses based on initial observations, but these are not accepted as truths until rigorously tested. This iterative process ensures that conclusions are based on evidence rather than speculation.
Similarly, at the national level in India, In early 1971, as tensions were escalating in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh), Indira Gandhi was keen on military intervention. During a high-level meeting, she asked Manekshaw if the Indian Army was ready to launch an immediate attack. Despite the immense pressure, Manekshaw critically replied that the army was not ready for immediate action. Manekshaw’s response was not what the Prime Minister wanted to hear, but he stood his ground and his constructive doubts made him a true man of military science.
Along with these at the international sphere, in 1955, Rosa Parks, an African-American woman, refused to give up her seat to a white passenger on a segregated bus. Her act of defiance sparked the Bus Boycott and became a pivotal moment in the civil rights movement, demonstrating tremendous courage in the pursuit of racial equality. His ability to question racial segregation and counter the orthodox behavior in transport made her the true leader of social science subsequently forced to make laws against racism in the USA.
Another side of the coin
While doubt is indispensable in science, it must be balanced with evidence-based reasoning and a willingness to accept provisional truths. Excessive doubt is called as “radical doubt” that can hinder progress by rejecting well-substantiated theories without justification. For example, in 1962, the court judgment noted that privacy is not a constitutionally protected right in India in the Kharak Singh case due to excessive doubt. However, the Supreme Court in the Puttaswamy case in 2017 recognized the right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution.
Similarly, excessive doubt can erode a person’s self-confidence and self-trust. Thereby, it leads to poor leadership. his can create a cycle of insecurity, where the individual becomes afraid of failure. For instance, an employee who doubts their capacity to lead a team might avoid taking on leadership roles, even if they are capable of performing well in those roles. Consequently, it also hinders the growth and progress of an individual, society or country. Its spillover effect can also affect interpersonal relationships.
Ways to develop critical thinking
To cultivate a society where people are critically aware, several systemic and cultural changes are necessary. For example, education is one of the cornerstones of fostering critical awareness. Schools and universities should emphasize the development of critical thinking skills from an early age, not just the rot learning and absorption of information. The curriculum should be designed to teach students how to think, not just what to think. It would improve logic, reasoning, and problem-solving techniques.
Along with these, traditional rote learning methods should be supplemented with more interactive and inquiry-based methods. This can include discussions, debates, group projects, and critical reading exercises where students must analyze and evaluate different viewpoints. Also, students should be encouraged to make their own decisions and solve problems independently which would foster critical thinking among the people. It would also make society accountable and equitable.
In conclusion, critical thinking captures the essence of what makes science dynamic, progressive, and self-correcting. Doubt drives inquiry, challenges assumptions, and paves the way for deeper understanding. From Galileo to Einstein, history is replete with examples of skeptics whose doubts revolutionized our view of the world.
Read more Essays here – Link for more essays
Support us
Hard work should be paid. It is free for all. Those who could not pay for the content can avail quality services free of cost. But those who have the ability to pay for the quality content he/she is receiving should pay as per his/her convenience. Team DWA will be highly thankful for your support.
